The Mantra (OM) token has fallen beneath $0.40, with RSI at 17.18, signalling oversold situations.
300M OM tokens are scheduled for burning to curb provide, however value restoration stays elusive.
The Mantra crew additionally plans governance reforms to revive belief, although volatility persists.
The Mantra protocol’s native token, OM, has plunged beneath $0.40, igniting hypothesis a few potential rebound as its Relative Energy Index (RSI) drops to an oversold degree of 17.18.
This steep decline follows a dramatic crash in April 2025, erasing billions in market capitalisation and shaking investor confidence.
With technical indicators flashing excessive bearish alerts and the MANTRA crew implementing token burns and governance reforms, the query looms: can OM recuperate, or is additional draw back inevitable?
A catastrophic OM token crash and lingering fallout
On April 13, 2025, MANTRA’s OM token plummeted from $6.30 to $0.37 in mere hours.
The collapse slashed the venture’s market capitalisation from $6 billion to underneath $700 million.
Attributed to compelled liquidations throughout low-liquidity weekend buying and selling, the crash sparked rumours of change involvement, which the crew swiftly denied.
CEO John Mullin launched on-chain knowledge to counter claims of insider promoting, confirming that team-held tokens remained locked.
In response to the disaster, MANTRA’s management took decisive motion to curb promoting stress.
CEO John Mullin burned 150 million staked OM tokens from the crew’s allocation on April 29, 2025.
A further 150 million tokens from ecosystem companions are slated for destruction, totalling 300 million OM—roughly 16.5% of the full provide.
This vital discount goals to tighten provide and bolster investor confidence.
Nevertheless, the market has but to reply, with OM lingering beneath key technical thresholds, suggesting scepticism persists.
Past token burns, MANTRA’s crew is pursuing structural adjustments to rebuild belief.
Plans for decentralising validators and upgrading governance intention to reinforce the protocol’s resilience and transparency.
These initiatives, whereas promising, require time to materialise and should not instantly affect value motion.
Regardless of these efforts, investor belief stays fragile, with OM struggling to regain footing.
Market individuals stay cautious, with volatility dominating OM’s short-term outlook.
The success of the launched reforms may decide whether or not MANTRA regains its former stature or continues to falter.
Technical indicators present the OM token is in an oversold area
From a technical evaluation standpoint, MANTRA’s value now sits nicely beneath its 20-day EMA of $0.51 and 50-day EMA of $0.74, underscoring a pronounced bearish development.
Nevertheless, the every day Relative Energy Index (RSI), at 17.01, marks one of many lowest ranges because the April crash, indicating excessive oversold situations.
Traditionally, RSI readings beneath 20 typically precede reduction rallies, as patrons capitalise on perceived undervaluation.
As well as, the MACD has turned bullish with a crossover and the histogram shifting above the zero line.
If shopping for momentum emerges, OM may goal the $0.42 resistance, with a break above $0.54 signalling stronger bullish affirmation.
Conversely, failure to carry the $0.37 assist dangers a slide to $0.30, doubtlessly deepening panic promoting.
Can Mantra value stage a comeback?
The convergence of an oversold RSI, vital token burns, and deliberate protocol upgrades creates a posh outlook for MANTRA.
Whereas technical indicators trace at a doable reduction bounce, sustained restoration hinges on restored investor confidence.
The $0.42–$0.54 value vary will probably be crucial for bulls to reclaim, whereas a drop beneath $0.37 may intensify bearish sentiment.
As MANTRA navigates this turbulent interval, its capability to execute on promised reforms and stabilise value motion will form its path ahead.
For now, merchants watch intently, weighing the potential for a rebound towards the chance of additional declines.
Discussion about this post